[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211115234603.2908381-7-bgardon@google.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:45:54 -0800
From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>,
Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@...il.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@...wei.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove need for a vcpu from mmu_try_to_unsync_pages
The vCPU argument to mmu_try_to_unsync_pages is now only used to get a
pointer to the associated struct kvm, so pass in the kvm pointer from
the beginning to remove the need for a vCPU when calling the function.
Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 16 ++++++++--------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 7d0da79668c0..1e890509b93f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2561,10 +2561,10 @@ static int kvm_mmu_unprotect_page_virt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
return r;
}
-static void kvm_unsync_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+static void kvm_unsync_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
trace_kvm_mmu_unsync_page(sp);
- ++vcpu->kvm->stat.mmu_unsync;
+ ++kvm->stat.mmu_unsync;
sp->unsync = 1;
kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
@@ -2576,7 +2576,7 @@ static void kvm_unsync_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
* were marked unsync (or if there is no shadow page), -EPERM if the SPTE must
* be write-protected.
*/
-int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
gfn_t gfn, bool can_unsync, bool prefetch)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
@@ -2587,7 +2587,7 @@ int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
* track machinery is used to write-protect upper-level shadow pages,
* i.e. this guards the role.level == 4K assertion below!
*/
- if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(vcpu->kvm, slot, gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE))
+ if (kvm_slot_page_track_is_active(kvm, slot, gfn, KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE))
return -EPERM;
/*
@@ -2596,7 +2596,7 @@ int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
* that case, KVM must complete emulation of the guest TLB flush before
* allowing shadow pages to become unsync (writable by the guest).
*/
- for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(vcpu->kvm, sp, gfn) {
+ for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(kvm, sp, gfn) {
if (!can_unsync)
return -EPERM;
@@ -2615,7 +2615,7 @@ int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
*/
if (!locked) {
locked = true;
- spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu_unsync_pages_lock);
+ spin_lock(&kvm->arch.mmu_unsync_pages_lock);
/*
* Recheck after taking the spinlock, a different vCPU
@@ -2630,10 +2630,10 @@ int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
}
WARN_ON(sp->role.level != PG_LEVEL_4K);
- kvm_unsync_page(vcpu, sp);
+ kvm_unsync_page(kvm, sp);
}
if (locked)
- spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu_unsync_pages_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_unsync_pages_lock);
/*
* We need to ensure that the marking of unsync pages is visible
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index 52c6527b1a06..1073d10cce91 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_ad_need_write_protect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_x86_ops.cpu_dirty_log_size;
}
-int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
gfn_t gfn, bool can_unsync, bool prefetch);
void kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index 75c666d3e7f1..b7271daa06c5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
* e.g. it's write-tracked (upper-level SPs) or has one or more
* shadow pages and unsync'ing pages is not allowed.
*/
- if (mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(vcpu, slot, gfn, can_unsync, prefetch)) {
+ if (mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(vcpu->kvm, slot, gfn, can_unsync, prefetch)) {
pgprintk("%s: found shadow page for %llx, marking ro\n",
__func__, gfn);
wrprot = true;
--
2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists