[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <163703493923.13692.11352680016082986967@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:55:39 +1100
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To: "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: "Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
"Anna Schumaker" <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
"Chuck Lever" <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Repair SWAP-over-NFS
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 01:44:04PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > swap-over-NFS currently has a variety of problems.
> >
> > Due to a newish test in generic_write_checks(), all writes to swap
> > currently fail.
>
> And by "currently", you mean "for over two years" (August 2019).
That's about the time scale for "enterprise" releases...
Actually, the earliest patches that impacted swap-over-NFS was more like
4 years ago. I didn't bother tracking Fixes: tags for everything that
was a fix, as I didn't think it would really help and might encourage
people to backport little bits of the series which I wouldn't recommend.
> Does swap-over-NFS (or any other network filesystem) actually have any
> users, and should we fix it or rip it out?
>
>
We have at least one user (why else would I be working on this?). I
think we have more, though they are presumably still on an earlier
release.
I'd prefer "fix it" over "rip it out".
I don't think any other network filesystem supports swap, but it is
not trivial to grep for.. There must be a 'swap_activate' method, and it
must return 0. There must also be a direct_IO that works.
The only other network filesystem with swap_activate is cifs. It
returns 0, but direct_IO returns -EINVAL.
NeilBrown
Powered by blists - more mailing lists