linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH linux-next] drm/msm/dp: remove unneeded variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE-0n50=P06ByQrG0FixVK4cGW--Vgt6uwGsLUu792SPhqzqXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:43:23 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     cgel.zte@...il.com, robdclark@...il.com
Cc:     sean@...rly.run, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
        abhinavk@...eaurora.org, deng.changcheng@....com.cn,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] drm/msm/dp: remove unneeded variable

Quoting cgel.zte@...il.com (2021-11-10 04:05:12)
> From: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@....com.cn>
>
> Fix the following coccicheck review:
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_debug.c: Unneeded variable
>
> Remove unneeded variable used to store return value.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@....com.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_debug.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_debug.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_debug.c
> index 2f6247e80e9d..c5c75273d1e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_debug.c
> @@ -365,7 +365,6 @@ static const struct file_operations test_active_fops = {
>
>  static int dp_debug_init(struct dp_debug *dp_debug, struct drm_minor *minor)

Would be nice to make it void as well and then cleanup the caller. Can
you do that too?

>  {
> -       int rc = 0;
>         struct dp_debug_private *debug = container_of(dp_debug,
>                         struct dp_debug_private, dp_debug);
>