linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: freq_table: Initialize cpuinfo.max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:00:40 -0600
From:   Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>
To:     Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>, rafael@...nel.org,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: freq_table: Initialize cpuinfo.max_freq to
 correct max frequency.


On 11/15/21 7:23 PM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> Hi Thara,
> <snip>
>
> And it doesn't go up, I even tried adding a sleep of 1 second between 
> the echo 1/0/1 lines and while 2956800 goes up to 28 (but never uses 
> it) it seems like, unless I do it manually once I've logged in, which 
> I'm assuming is a lot slower than waiting 1 second between them, it's 
> not quite giving us 2956800 "easily".
>
> If the email wasn't clear, please let me know! I tried to explain as 
> best I could what I am seeing here.
>
> -- steev
>
So after more testing... *sometimes* it works, with the jiggle, but not 
always.  I'm really not sure why though, so if there's any guidance, I'm 
all for it!

-- steev