linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/355] 5.4.160-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c64fce18-9b31-c8ce-c6ff-7561ba6e90bc@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:32:04 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, stable@...r.kernel.org, pavel@...x.de,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/355] 5.4.160-rc1 review



On 11/15/2021 10:00 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 22:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.160 release.
>> There are 355 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:52:23 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>          https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.160-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>          git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
> 
> 
> Perf build broken due to following errors.
> 
>> Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
>>      libbpf: Fix BTF data layout checks and allow empty BTF
> 
> 
> In file included from btf.c:17:
> btf.c: In function 'btf_parse_hdr':
> btf.c:104:62: error: 'struct btf' has no member named 'raw_size'; did
> you mean 'data_size'?
>    104 |                 pr_debug("Invalid BTF total size:%u\n", btf->raw_size);
>        |                                                              ^~~~~~~~
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> Build log:
> https://builds.tuxbuild.com/20xsgAxLwf4E60xl2dTdXnNS8FZ/

Same here.
-- 
Florian