[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8426729-6fd8-4855-d934-552d80f74561@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:04:57 +0800
From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, frederic@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: ignore nohz_full cores in new cpumask
On 2021/11/15 下午11:31, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Fri 2021-11-12 13:14:34, Zqiang wrote:
>> If the nohz_full is enabled, when update watchdog_mask, the
>> nohz_full cores should be ignored.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/watchdog.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
>> index ad912511a0c0..3ef11a94783c 100644
>> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
>> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
>> @@ -628,7 +628,9 @@ void lockup_detector_soft_poweroff(void)
>> static void proc_watchdog_update(void)
>> {
>> /* Remove impossible cpus to keep sysctl output clean. */
>> - cpumask_and(&watchdog_cpumask, &watchdog_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
>> + cpumask_and(&watchdog_cpumask, &watchdog_cpumask,
>> housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_TIMER));
> I am not familiar with nozh_full code but this looks fine.
>
>
>> + if (cpumask_empty(&watchdog_cpumask))
>> + return;
> But this looks looks wrong. Is there any reason for this?
>
> We need to stop the watchdog when it was running before.
>
> I mean that lockup_detector_reconfigure() must be called anytime
> when the mask has changed even when it became empty.
Thanks Petr
I will resend patch v2.
>
>
>> lockup_detector_reconfigure();
>> }
> Best Regards,
> Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists