lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <368c990c30c5bacde15ac4bce5db8389aea3ec9c.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 22:35:23 +0000
From:   "Winiarska, Iwona" <iwona.winiarska@...el.com>
To:     "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
        "jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com" <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
        "andrew@...id.au" <andrew@...id.au>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "d.mueller@...oft.ch" <d.mueller@...oft.ch>,
        "jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
        "rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "zweiss@...inix.com" <zweiss@...inix.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "joel@....id.au" <joel@....id.au>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com" 
        <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" 
        <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/13] peci: Add device detection

On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 19:49 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 07:25:45PM +0100, Iwona Winiarska wrote:
> > +void peci_device_destroy(struct peci_device *device)
> > +{
> > +       bool killed;
> > +
> > +       device_lock(&device->dev);
> > +       killed = kill_device(&device->dev);
> 
> Eeek, why call this?
> 
> > +       device_unlock(&device->dev);
> > +
> > +       if (!killed)
> > +               return;
> 
> What happened if something changed after you unlocked it?

We either killed it, or the other caller killed it.

> 
> Why is kill_device() required at all?  That's a very rare function to
> call, and one that only one "bus" calls today because it is very
> special (i.e. crazy and broken...)

It's used to avoid double-delete in case of races between peci_controller
unregister and "manually" removing the device using sysfs (pointed out by Dan in
v2). We're calling peci_device_destroy() in both callsites.
Other way to solve it would be to just have a peci-specific lock, but
kill_device seemed to be well suited for the problem at hand.
Do you suggest to remove it and just go with the lock?

Thanks
-Iwona

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ