[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fec64d66-8019-ae14-fd11-9af88440c12a@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:05:56 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, digetx@...il.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
cw00.choi@...sung.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: tegra20-emc: Remove unnecessary print function
dev_err()
On 16/11/2021 02:39, Xu Wang wrote:
> The print function dev_err() is redundant because
> platform_get_irq() already prints an error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c
> index 497b6edbf3ca..b2107d16570e 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c
> @@ -1207,10 +1207,8 @@ static int tegra_emc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int irq, err;
>
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (irq < 0) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "please update your device tree\n");
> + if (irq < 0)
> return irq;
> - }
No, it's not redundant because it is a different error message.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists