lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 16 Nov 2021 20:42:28 +0800
From:   Yinan Liu <yinan@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     rostedt@...dmis.org, mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in
 ftrace_init to compile time



在 2021/11/16 下午4:07, Peter Zijlstra 写道:

> /me hands a bucket of {} your way. 

--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -6406,8 +6406,10 @@ static int ftrace_process_locs(struct module *mod,
         if (!count)
                 return 0;

-       sort(start, count, sizeof(*start),
-            ftrace_cmp_ips, NULL);
+       if (mod) {
+               sort(start, count, sizeof(*start),
+                    ftrace_cmp_ips, NULL);
+       }

hi,peter

you mean like this? I hope I'm not mistaken.


 > Also, can't sorttable be ran on modules ?

The .ko file will be relocated after insmod or modprobe.
And the mcount redirection in .ko is based on ".text",
".init.text", ".ref.text", ".sched.text", ".spinlock.text",
".irqentry .text", ".softirqentry.text", ".kprobes.text", 
".cpuidle.text", ".text.unlikely". These sections‘ loading
position are not in definite order.

So sorting this part at compile time doesn't make much sense.




Best regards!
--Yinan liu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ