[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZPHUmDdGF/59XqA@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:59:30 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc: YC Hung <yc.hung@...iatek.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
tiwai@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
daniel.baluta@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: separate the common code
from machine driver
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 05:33:48PM +0800, Trevor Wu wrote:
> Is the reply from YC clear? Any suggestion would be appreciated. If you
> need more information, please let us know.
Not really. It's super high level and only at the driver level, not
talking about the hardware much. As far as I can see it's showing a
single physical system and even seems to have what looks like it's
supposed to be two cards connected together which really seems like
it's a single device.
> Additionally, it was my understanding you suggested that DSP routes
> should be configurable in some ways, and we should not just add a new
> driver for SOF in case we need to support some other interface
> combinations in the future. If I'm wrong, please kindly correct me.
Yes, I'd not expect a separate driver depending on system configuration.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists