[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZPc7MLxwmd47YYw@qian-HP-Z2-SFF-G5-Workstation>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:31:40 -0500
From: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<dvyukov@...gle.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<valentin.schneider@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<woodylin@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reset task stack state in bringup_cpu()
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:33:10AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> To hot unplug a CPU, the idle task on that CPU calls a few layers of C
> code before finally leaving the kernel. When KASAN is in use, poisoned
> shadow is left around for each of the active stack frames, and when
> shadow call stacks are in use. When shadow call stacks are in use the
> task's SCS SP is left pointing at an arbitrary point within the task's
> shadow call stack.
>
> When an offlines CPU is hotlpugged back into the kernel, this stale
> state can adversely affect the newly onlined CPU. Stale KASAN shadow can
> alias new stackframes and result in bogus KASAN warnings. A stale SCS SP
> is effectively a memory leak, and prevents a portion of the shadow call
> stack being used. Across a number of hotplug cycles the task's entire
> shadow call stack can become unusable.
>
> We previously fixed the KASAN issue in commit:
>
> e1b77c92981a5222 ("sched/kasan: remove stale KASAN poison after hotplug")
>
> In commit:
>
> f1a0a376ca0c4ef1 ("sched/core: Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled")
>
> ... we broke both KASAN and SCS, with SCS being fixed up in commit:
>
> 63acd42c0d4942f7 ("sched/scs: Reset the shadow stack when idle_task_exit")
>
> ... but as this runs in the context of the idle task being offlines it's
> potentially fragile.
>
> Fix both of these consistently and more robustly by resetting the SCS SP
> and KASAN shadow immediately before we online a CPU. This ensures the
> idle task always has a consistent state, and removes the need to do so
> when initializing an idle task or when unplugging an idle task.
>
> I've tested this with both GCC and clang, with reelvant options enabled,
> offlining and online CPUs with:
>
> | while true; do
> | for C in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/online; do
> | echo 0 > $C;
> | echo 1 > $C;
> | done
> | done
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211012083521.973587-1-woodylin@google.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/YY9ECKyPtDbD9q8q@qian-HP-Z2-SFF-G5-Workstation/
> Fixes: 1a0a376ca0c4ef1 ("sched/core: Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled")
> Reported-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Thanks for fixing this quickly, Mark. Triggering an user-after-free in
user namespace but don't think it is related. I'll investigate that
first since it is blocking the rest of regression testing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists