[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZPkx05aORIvd73N@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 19:05:11 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
Cc: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 net-next 00/23] add support for VSC75XX control
over SPI
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 07:04:04AM -0800, Colin Foster wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:34:17PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:23:05PM -0800, Colin Foster wrote:
> > > My apologies for this next RFC taking so long. Life got in the way.
> > >
> > > The patch set in general is to add support for the VSC7511, VSC7512,
> > > VSC7513 and VSC7514 devices controlled over SPI. The driver is
> > > relatively functional for the internal phy ports (0-3) on the VSC7512.
> > > As I'll discuss, it is not yet functional for other ports yet.
> >
> > Since series touches fwnode, please Cc next time to Daniel Scally.
>
> Thank you. I will do this next time.
>
> For my future reference, is there a way that I could have known this? Or
> is this just knowledge that comes with experience? The email list I got
> was from running the patch set through get_maintainers.
It's just an ad-hoc since there are a few independent teams are doing
something that related to fwnode APIs: Daniel due to camera work for ACPI
enabled platforms, Qian due to a design bug with fwnode, Anand due to IIO
drivers, you are due to PHY (and possibly others I have no knowledge about).
I haven't asked for the others I listed above since their work probably
doesn't cross what you are doing, but camera might be closer.
> > It also appears [1] that somewhere in PHY code a bug is hidden
> > (at least I think so).
>
> Thank you for this information. I'll keep an eye out!
>
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211113204141.520924-1-djrscally@gmail.com/T/#u
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists