[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211116205233.m4j47haadkgdjdwh@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 21:52:33 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore/ftrace: add a kernel parameter to start pstore
recording
Hello Steven,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:37:05PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:28:35 +0100
> Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > > Is this still needed? It's still in my internal patchwork, and I haven't
> > > seen any responses.
> >
> > I didn't see any responses either, and unless someone else implemented
> > something similar somewhere else, it's still needed.
> >
> > The change was actually useful to debug a clk problem, where the machine
> > freezed when a certain driver was loaded.
>
> Perhaps I should ask this. Would anyone object if I just take this change
> through my tree for the next merge window?
I don't know.
(To be interpreted as in
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1884607/does-everyone-want-coffee-propositional-logic-problem :-)
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists