[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211116163407.7e0c6129@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:34:07 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: menglong8.dong@...il.com
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, mingo@...hat.com,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org, imagedong@...cent.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: snmp: add tracepoint support for snmp
On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 21:35:29 +0800
menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:
> +#define DEFINE_SNMP_EVENT(proto) \
> +DEFINE_EVENT(snmp_template, snmp_##proto, \
> + TP_PROTO(struct sk_buff *skb, int field, int val), \
> + TP_ARGS(skb, field, val) \
> +)
> +
> +#define TRACE_SNMP(skb, proto, field, val) \
> + trace_snmp_##proto(skb, field, val)
> +
> +#endif
Why make a separate trace event for each protocol, and not just create an
enum that gets passed to the trace event? Then you could just filter on
what you want.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists