[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211116215715.645231-1-surenb@google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 13:57:14 -0800
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@...nel.org, mhocko@...e.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
willy@...radead.org, hannes@...xchg.org, guro@...com,
riel@...riel.com, minchan@...nel.org, kirill@...temov.name,
aarcange@...hat.com, christian@...uner.io, hch@...radead.org,
oleg@...hat.com, david@...hat.com, jannh@...gle.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
fweimer@...hat.com, jengelh@...i.de, timmurray@...gle.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, surenb@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm: protect free_pgtables with mmap_lock write lock in exit_mmap
oom-reaper and process_mrelease system call should protect against
races with exit_mmap which can destroy page tables while they
walk the VMA tree. oom-reaper protects from that race by setting
MMF_OOM_VICTIM and by relying on exit_mmap to set MMF_OOM_SKIP
before taking and releasing mmap_write_lock. process_mrelease has
to elevate mm->mm_users to prevent such race. Both oom-reaper and
process_mrelease hold mmap_read_lock when walking the VMA tree.
The locking rules and mechanisms could be simpler if exit_mmap takes
mmap_write_lock while executing destructive operations such as
free_pgtables.
Change exit_mmap to hold the mmap_write_lock when calling
free_pgtables. Operations like unmap_vmas() and unlock_range() are not
destructive and could run under mmap_read_lock but for simplicity we
take one mmap_write_lock during almost the entire operation. Note
also that because oom-reaper checks VM_LOCKED flag, unlock_range()
should not be allowed to race with it.
In most cases this lock should be uncontended. Previously, Kirill
reported ~4% regression caused by a similar change [1]. We reran the
same test and although the individual results are quite noisy, the
percentiles show lower regression with 1.6% being the worst case [2].
The change allows oom-reaper and process_mrelease to execute safely
under mmap_read_lock without worries that exit_mmap might destroy page
tables from under them.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20170725141723.ivukwhddk2voyhuc@node.shutemov.name/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJuCfpGC9-c9P40x7oy=jy5SphMcd0o0G_6U1-+JAziGKG6dGA@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
---
mm/mmap.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index bfb0ea164a90..69b3036c6dee 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -3142,25 +3142,27 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
* to mmu_notifier_release(mm) ensures mmu notifier callbacks in
* __oom_reap_task_mm() will not block.
*
- * This needs to be done before calling munlock_vma_pages_all(),
+ * This needs to be done before calling unlock_range(),
* which clears VM_LOCKED, otherwise the oom reaper cannot
* reliably test it.
*/
(void)__oom_reap_task_mm(mm);
set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
- mmap_write_lock(mm);
- mmap_write_unlock(mm);
}
+ mmap_write_lock(mm);
if (mm->locked_vm)
unlock_range(mm->mmap, ULONG_MAX);
arch_exit_mmap(mm);
vma = mm->mmap;
- if (!vma) /* Can happen if dup_mmap() received an OOM */
+ if (!vma) {
+ /* Can happen if dup_mmap() received an OOM */
+ mmap_write_unlock(mm);
return;
+ }
lru_add_drain();
flush_cache_mm(mm);
@@ -3170,6 +3172,7 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, 0, -1);
free_pgtables(&tlb, vma, FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, USER_PGTABLES_CEILING);
tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
+ mmap_write_unlock(mm);
/*
* Walk the list again, actually closing and freeing it,
--
2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists