lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 17 Nov 2021 00:54:19 +0100
From:   Krzysztof WilczyƄski <kw@...ux.com>
To:     Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
Cc:     Yuji Nakao <contact@...inakao.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        ". Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Jeremy Soller <jeremy@...tem76.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel 5.15 doesn't detect SATA drive on boot

[+CC Adding Jeremy for visibility]

Hi Damien,

[...]
> > The error in the dmesg output (see [2] where the log file is attached)
> > looks similar to the problem reported a week or so ago, as per:
> > 
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/ee3884db-da17-39e3-4010-bcc8f878e2f6@xenosoft.de/
> 
> Thanks. I searched this thread but could not find it in the archive.
> Early morning, need more coffee :)

No worries!  Got you covered!

     )))
    (((
  +-----+
  |     |]
  `-----'

Enjoy!

> 
> > 
> > The problematic commits where reverted by Bjorn and the Pull Request that
> > did it was accepted, as per:
> > 
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20211111195040.GA1345641@bhelgaas/
> > 
> > Thus, this would made its way into 5.16-rc1, I suppose.  We might have to
> > back-port this to the stable and long-term kernels.
> 
> Yes, I think the fix needs to go in 5.15, which is latest stable and LTS.

On the plus side, not everyone is on 5.15 yet, but those who are using it would
have some issues.  Albeit, with it being an LTS release, the adoption might
increase rapidly.

For instance, I believe that Pop!_OS already ships kernels that are very close
to the upstream, which would hit their current user base.

	Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ