linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/355] 5.4.160-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvxhzL9KUxZcRzMxnbGPK5GKTCtb5kWM3JB09D+-KhVug@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 23:30:41 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, pavel@...x.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/355] 5.4.160-rc1 review

On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 22:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.160 release.
> There are 355 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:52:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.160-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Perf build broken due to following errors.

> Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
>     libbpf: Fix BTF data layout checks and allow empty BTF


In file included from btf.c:17:
btf.c: In function 'btf_parse_hdr':
btf.c:104:62: error: 'struct btf' has no member named 'raw_size'; did
you mean 'data_size'?
  104 |                 pr_debug("Invalid BTF total size:%u\n", btf->raw_size);
      |                                                              ^~~~~~~~

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

Build log:
https://builds.tuxbuild.com/20xsgAxLwf4E60xl2dTdXnNS8FZ/

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org