linux-kernel - is arch/h8300 dead, was Re: linux-next: stats (Was: Linux 5.16-rc1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YZKgrSNXR87q2HSD@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 10:02:21 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        uclinux-h8-devel@...ts.sourceforge.jp
Subject: is arch/h8300 dead, was Re: linux-next: stats (Was: Linux 5.16-rc1)

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 02:17:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> There are also 424 commits in next-20211101 that didn't make it into
> v5.16-rc1.
> 
> Top ten first word of commit summary:
> 
>      53 bluetooth
>      37 tools
>      23 rcu
>      21 drm
>      18 arm
>      17 iio
>      13 soc
>      10 h8300

At least two of the h8300 ones also were in linux-next for the previous
merge window and didn't make it (my set_fs removal patches).  What is
the maintainer status of h8300 when nothing gets sent on to Linus?