lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0cdf3cb10293ead1acd271fdb8a70369c298c082.1637186628.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Date:   Wed, 17 Nov 2021 23:05:23 +0100
From:   Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To:     alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, npitre@...libre.com,
        boris.brezillon@...labora.com
Cc:     linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] i3c/master: Fix a potentially infinite loop in 'hci_dat_v1_get_index()'

The code in 'hci_dat_v1_get_index()' really looks like a hand coded version
of 'for_each_set_bit()', except that a +1 is missing when searching for the
next set bit.

This really looks odd and it seems that it will loop until 'dat_w0_read()'
returns the expected result.

So use 'for_each_set_bit()' instead. It is less verbose and should be more
correct.

Fixes: 9ad9a52cce28 ("i3c/master: introduce the mipi-i3c-hci driver")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
---
Speculative fix. Untested.
---
 drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/dat_v1.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/dat_v1.c b/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/dat_v1.c
index 783e551a2c85..97bb49ff5b53 100644
--- a/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/dat_v1.c
+++ b/drivers/i3c/master/mipi-i3c-hci/dat_v1.c
@@ -160,9 +160,7 @@ static int hci_dat_v1_get_index(struct i3c_hci *hci, u8 dev_addr)
 	unsigned int dat_idx;
 	u32 dat_w0;
 
-	for (dat_idx = find_first_bit(hci->DAT_data, hci->DAT_entries);
-	     dat_idx < hci->DAT_entries;
-	     dat_idx = find_next_bit(hci->DAT_data, hci->DAT_entries, dat_idx)) {
+	for_each_set_bit(dat_idx, hci->DAT_data, hci->DAT_entries) {
 		dat_w0 = dat_w0_read(dat_idx);
 		if (FIELD_GET(DAT_0_DYNAMIC_ADDRESS, dat_w0) == dev_addr)
 			return dat_idx;
-- 
2.30.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ