[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211117222443.3d050caa@sal.lan>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 22:24:43 +0000
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
To: Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nable <nable.maininbox@...glemail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>,
"andrey.i.trufanov" <andrey.i.trufanov@...il.com>,
Patrik Gfeller <patrik.gfeller@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/17] media: atomisp: pci: do not use err var when
checking port validity for ISP2400
Hi
Em Thu, 11 Nov 2021 18:38:12 +0000
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org> escreveu:
> > The `ifdef ISP2401` was the result of merging two different version of
> > driver, added on the initial commit of upstreamed atomisp. And for the
> > `ifdef ISP2401`, I confirmed I can remove (almost [1]) all of them against
> > the initial commit of atomisp [2][3]
> >
> > [1] here are the three exceptions:
> > ("NOTE: ifdef ISP2400/ISP2401 usage in aero-atomisp")
> > https://github.com/kitakar5525/linux-kernel/commit/1a8488cdd31ad38a3805824700b29d1e5213d3f2
> >
> > [2] ("atomisp: pci: css2400: remove ISP2401 ifdefs")
> > https://github.com/kitakar5525/linux-kernel/commit/dd6723fc5b9fe040e33b227b509a7e004243edce
> > [3] ("atomisp: pci: remove ISP2401 ifdefs for main pci driver")
> > https://github.com/kitakar5525/linux-kernel/commit/1734341f84a96945af7635f6fff061db910f746f
>
> Ok, if there are more if/ifdef ISP2401 that, if reverted will keep the
> driver running with the firmware we're using, I'm all for it. Just send
> the patches ;-)
I went ahead and solved several INPUT_SYSTEM related ifdefs on a way
that it is compatible with Intel Aero firmware for the sh_css* files.
Except if I made any mistake, the ifdefs that are related to the
input system were already addressed.
I didn't notice any changes when running camorama on the PREVIEW
node.
Please test. Feel free to submit fixup patches if needed.
Regards,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists