linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: RISC-V: Cap KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS by KVM_CAP_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAhSdy3VTfXmt4ub9SWwFQWwcqCS07WkwXdh6ObOcoZSp5oY=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:32:18 +0530
From:   Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc:     KVM General <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: RISC-V: Cap KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS by KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:05 PM Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> It doesn't make sense to return the recommended maximum number of
> vCPUs which exceeds the maximum possible number of vCPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>

Looks good to me.

For KVM RISC-V:
Acked-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>

Thanks,
Anup

> ---
>  arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c
> index 26399df15b63..fb18af34a4b5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vm.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>                 r = 1;
>                 break;
>         case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS:
> -               r = num_online_cpus();
> +               r = min_t(unsigned int, num_online_cpus(), KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
>                 break;
>         case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
>                 r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
> --
> 2.33.1
>