[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211117060155.GA7792@hu-pkondeti-hyd.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:31:55 +0530
From: Pavan Kondeti <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>
To: Sandeep Maheswaram <quic_c_sanm@...cinc.com>
CC: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"Matthias Kaehlcke" <mka@...omium.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>,
<quic_ppratap@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] usb: dwc3: core: Host wake up support from system
suspend
Hi Sandeep,
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 01:23:41PM +0530, Sandeep Maheswaram wrote:
> Avoiding phy powerdown when wakeup capable devices are connected
> by checking wakeup property of xhci plat device.
> Phy should be on to wake up the device from suspend using wakeup capable
> devices such as keyboard and mouse.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Maheswaram <quic_c_sanm@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> index 643239d..a6ad0ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> @@ -1787,7 +1787,7 @@ static int dwc3_suspend_common(struct dwc3 *dwc, pm_message_t msg)
> dwc3_core_exit(dwc);
> break;
> case DWC3_GCTL_PRTCAP_HOST:
> - if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg)) {
> + if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg) && !device_may_wakeup(&dwc->xhci->dev)) {
> dwc3_core_exit(dwc);
> break;
> }
> @@ -1848,13 +1848,16 @@ static int dwc3_resume_common(struct dwc3 *dwc, pm_message_t msg)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
> break;
> case DWC3_GCTL_PRTCAP_HOST:
> - if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg)) {
> + if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg) && !device_may_wakeup(&dwc->xhci->dev)) {
> ret = dwc3_core_init_for_resume(dwc);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> dwc3_set_prtcap(dwc, DWC3_GCTL_PRTCAP_HOST);
> break;
> + } else {
> + dwc3_set_prtcap(dwc, DWC3_GCTL_PRTCAP_HOST);
> }
> +
During runtime resume, we enter else block and call dwc3_set_prtcap() which
is not done before. Is that intentional?
Thanks,
Pavan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists