[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <977fbfb8aaae8a54d8769f49d397d68f6387a0e8.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:41:20 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: cgel.zte@...il.com, luciano.coelho@...el.com
Cc: kvalo@...eaurora.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
miriam.rachel.korenblit@...el.com, ye.guojin@....com.cn,
johannes.berg@...el.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: rs: fixup the return value type of
iwl_legacy_rate_to_fw_idx()
On Wed, 2021-11-17 at 06:36 +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Ye Guojin <ye.guojin@....com.cn>
>
> This was found by coccicheck:
> ./drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/rs.c, 147, 10-21, WARNING
> Unsigned expression compared with zero legacy_rate < 0
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/rs.c
[]
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ u32 iwl_new_rate_from_v1(u32 rate_v1)
> }
> /* if legacy format */
> } else {
> - u32 legacy_rate = iwl_legacy_rate_to_fw_idx(rate_v1);
> + int legacy_rate = iwl_legacy_rate_to_fw_idx(rate_v1);
>
> WARN_ON(legacy_rate < 0);
Why not just remove the WARN_ON instead?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists