linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v6] page_pool: disable dma mapping support for 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <712f3c04-ffc4-0ae1-00e2-1acb1af81154@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Nov 2021 12:52:18 +0100
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To:     Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
Cc:     brouer@...hat.com, Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
        Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...neuler.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org, will@...nel.org,
        jhubbard@...dia.com, yuzhao@...gle.com, mcroce@...rosoft.com,
        fenghua.yu@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com, jgg@...pe.ca,
        aarcange@...hat.com, guro@...com,
        "kernelci@...ups.io" <kernelci@...ups.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] page_pool: disable dma mapping support for
 32-bit arch with 64-bit DMA



On 15/11/2021 19.55, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>>>>>>> Some more details can be found here:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     https://linux.kernelci.org/test/case/id/6189968c3ec0a3c06e3358fe/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here's the same revision on the same platform booting fine with a
>>>>>>>>> plain multi_v7_defconfig build:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     https://linux.kernelci.org/test/plan/id/61899d322c0e9fee7e3358ec/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please let us know if you need any help debugging this issue or
>>>>>>>>> if you have a fix to try.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The patch below is removing the dma mapping support in page pool
>>>>>>>> for 32 bit systems with 64 bit dma address, so it seems there
>>>>>>>> is indeed a a drvier using the the page pool with PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP
>>>>>>>> flags set in a 32 bit systems with 64 bit dma address.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It seems we might need to revert the below patch or implement the
>>>>>>>> DMA-mapping tracking support in the driver as mentioned in the below
>>>>>>>> commit log.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> which ethernet driver do you use in your system?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for taking a look and sorry for the slow reply.  Here's a
>>>>>>> booting test job with LPAE disabled:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       https://linux.kernelci.org/test/plan/id/618dbb81c60c4d94503358f1/
>>>>>>>       https://storage.kernelci.org/mainline/master/v5.15-12452-g5833291ab6de/arm/multi_v7_defconfig/gcc-10/lab-collabora/baseline-nfs-rk3288-rock2-square.html#L812
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [    8.314523] rk_gmac-dwmac ff290000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So the driver is drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the report, this patch seems to cause problem for 32-bit
>>>>>> system with LPAE enabled.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As LPAE seems like a common feature for 32 bits system, this patch
>>>>>> might need to be reverted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Jesper, @Ilias, what do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So enabling LPAE also enables CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT on that board?
>>>>> Doing a quick grep only selects that for XEN.  I am ok reverting that,  but
>>>>> I think we need to understand how the dma address ended up being 64bit.
>>>>
>>>> So looking a bit closer, indeed enabling LPAE always enables this.  So
>>>> we need to revert the patch.
>>>> Yunsheng will you send that?
>>>
>>> Sure.
>>
>> Why don't we change that driver[1] to not use page_pool_get_dma_addr() ?
>>
>>   [1] drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
>>
>> I took a closer look and it seems the driver have struct stmmac_rx_buffer in
>> which is stored the dma_addr it gets from page_pool_get_dma_addr().
>>
>> See func: stmmac_init_rx_buffers
>>
>>   static int stmmac_init_rx_buffers(struct stmmac_priv *priv,
>> 				struct dma_desc *p,
>> 				int i, gfp_t flags, u32 queue)
>>   {
>>
>> 	if (!buf->page) {
>> 		buf->page = page_pool_dev_alloc_pages(rx_q->page_pool);
>> 		if (!buf->page)
>> 			return -ENOMEM;
>> 		buf->page_offset = stmmac_rx_offset(priv);
>> 	}
>> 	[...]
>>
>> 	buf->addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(buf->page) + buf->page_offset;
>>
>> 	stmmac_set_desc_addr(priv, p, buf->addr);
>> 	[...]
>>   }
>>
>> I question if this driver really to use page_pool for storing the dma_addr
>> as it just extract it and store it outside page_pool?
>>
>> @Ilias it looks like you added part of the page_pool support in this driver,
>> so I hope you can give a qualified guess on:
>> How much work will it be to let driver do the DMA-map itself?
>> (and not depend on the DMA-map feature provided by page_pool)
> 
> It shouldn't be that hard.   However when we removed that we were hoping we
> had no active consumers.  So we'll have to fix this and check for other
> 32-bit boards with LPAE and page_pool handling the DMA mappings.
> But the point now is that this is far from a 'hardware configuration' of
> 32-bit CPU + 64-bit DMA.  Every armv7 and x86 board can get that.  So I was
> thinking it's better to revert this and live with the 'weird' handling in the
> code.

Okay, I acked the revert.  After discussing this over IRC with Ilias (my 
page_pool co-maintainer). Guess we will have to live with maintaining 
this code for 32-bit CPU + 64-bit DMA.

--Jesper