linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: llcc-qcom: Add SM8350 compatible and defines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f1c7a135-b74a-ea98-b7e0-8602fa7a92b7@somainline.org>
Date:   Wed, 17 Nov 2021 13:21:48 +0100
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Cc:     martin.botka@...ainline.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Souradeep Chowdhury <schowdhu@...eaurora.org>,
        Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: llcc-qcom: Add SM8350
 compatible and defines


On 17/11/2021 07:56, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Konrad Dybcio (2021-11-13 17:29:38)
>> Document the compatible string for SM8350 and add required defines to the
>> binding.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,llcc.yaml | 1 +
>>   include/linux/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.h                       | 4 ++++
> Why is this include file part of this patch. Shouldn't it be in the next
> patch?
>
Right, out of habit I treated it as if it was a part of dt-bindings, when it

isn't. Thanks for spotting that.


Konrad