[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5148de60-4a9d-67ef-ca64-5c6461034c0c@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:06:59 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: joro@...tes.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, jon.grimm@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: SVM: Extend host physical APIC ID field to
support more than 8-bit
On 11/10/21 11:18, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> + if (level_type != 2 || !x2apic_mode) {
> + avic_host_physical_id_mask = 0xffULL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + core_mask_width = eax & 0xF;
> +
> + max_phys_mask_width = get_count_order(apic_get_max_phys_apicid());
> +
> + /*
> + * Sanity check to ensure core_mask_width for a processor does not
> + * exceed the calculated mask.
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON(core_mask_width > max_phys_mask_width))
> + return -EINVAL;
Can it just use apic_get_max_phys_apicid() in x2apic mode, and 0xff in
!x2apic mode? I'm not sure why you need to check CPUID[0xb,0x1].
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists