lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76c2c8bf1717e51c2d859994bf3cf1e89c21f80d.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:53:36 -0500
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
        dwmw2@...radead.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        davem@...emloft.net, jarkko@...nel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
        serge@...lyn.com
Cc:     keescook@...omium.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        weiyongjun1@...wei.com, nayna@...ux.ibm.com, ebiggers@...gle.com,
        ardb@...nel.org, nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, lszubowi@...hat.com,
        jason@...c4.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, pjones@...hat.com,
        konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/17] KEYS: Create static version of
 public_key_verify_signature

On Wed, 2021-11-17 at 08:32 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 19:15 -0500, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> > The kernel test robot reports undefined reference to
> > public_key_verify_signature when CONFIG_ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE is
> > not defined. Create a static version in this case and return -EINVAL.
> > 
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by:  Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>

Perhaps this patch wouldn't be needed if 

+config INTEGRITY_MACHINE_KEYRING
+       bool "Provide a keyring to which CA Machine Owner Keys may be
added"
+       depends on SECONDARY_TRUSTED_KEYRING
+       depends on INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS

depends on ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE=y

+       depends on SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING
+       depends on LOAD_UEFI_KEYS

Mimi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ