linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/tc-testing: add exit code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211117060535.1d47295a@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Nov 2021 06:05:35 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:     Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li@...el.com>, shuah@...nel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, lizhijian@...fujitsu.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lkp@...el.com, philip.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/tc-testing: add exit code

On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:55:14 +0100 Davide Caratti wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 01:45:15PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
> > Mark the summary result as FAIL to prevent from confusing the selftest
> > framework if some of them are failed.
> > 
> > Previously, the selftest framework always treats it as *ok* even though
> > some of them are failed actually. That's because the script tdc.sh always
> > return 0.  
> 
> yes, also tdc was lacking support for KSFT_SKIP for a long time.

Should this go via netdev? Is the risk of conflicts low enough 
so it doesn't matter?

We should probably add a MAINTAINERS entry for tdc. Adding Jamal.