[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZUP0rlCX8PP93l2@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 11:21:06 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com, jolsa@...hat.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/test: Test case 27 broken on s390 in linux-next
Em Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 02:35:29PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan escreveu:
>
> On 11/3/21 21:22, Thomas Richter wrote:
> > Commit 10269a2ca2b08c ("perf test sample-parsing: Add endian test for struct branch_flags")
> > broke the test case 27 (Sample parsing) on s390 on linux-next tree:
> >
> > # ./perf test -Fv 27
> > 27: Sample parsing
> > --- start ---
> > parsing failed for sample_type 0x800
> > ---- end ----
> > Sample parsing: FAILED!
> > #
> >
> > The cause of the failure is a wrong #define BS_EXPECTED_BE statement
> > in above commit. Correct this define and the test case runs fine.
> >
> > Output After:
> > # ./perf test -Fv 27
> > 27: Sample parsing :
> > --- start ---
> > ---- end ----
> > Sample parsing: Ok
> > #
>
>
> Hi Thomas,
> Thanks for the fix. Not sure, I guess I messed up my big endian setup or
> test run I had before sending
> the patch. My bad. It fails for me too, but with your patch the issue fixed.
>
> Acked-and-Tested-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists