linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/923] 5.15.3-rc3 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YZUVKX0KraPWiXx1@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Nov 2021 15:43:53 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/923] 5.15.3-rc3 review

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 06:13:47AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/17/21 2:19 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.3 release.
> > There are 923 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 19 Nov 2021 10:14:52 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build is still broken for m68k.
> 
> drivers/block/ataflop.c: In function 'atari_cleanup_floppy_disk':
> drivers/block/ataflop.c:2050:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'blk_cleanup_disk'
> drivers/block/ataflop.c: In function 'atari_floppy_init':
> drivers/block/ataflop.c:2065:15: error: implicit declaration of function '__register_blkdev'
> 
> Are you sure you want to carry that patch series into v5.10.y ? I had to revert
> pretty much everything to get it to compile. It seems to me that someone should
> provide a working backport if the series is needed/wanted in v5.10.y.

Wow, I dropped the wrong patch :(

No, I don't want to carry that series, let me go rip out everything for
ataflop.c now.  If someone cares about this for 5.10.y, I'll take a
backport series, but really, they should just go use 5.15.y instead.

I'll push out a -rc4 now.

thanks,

greg k-h