[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZUiFr80mokTT7EO@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 15:39:02 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, bp@...en8.de, catalin.marinas@....com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com,
mhiramat@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] arm64: Make some stacktrace functions private
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 02:07:37PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Now that open-coded stack unwinds have been converted to
> arch_stack_walk(), we no longer need to expose any of unwind_frame(),
> walk_stackframe(), or start_backtrace() outside of stacktrace.c.
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists