[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa79a8eb-e7fa-ad81-f4a3-a843b63020b2@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:27:27 +0000
From: German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf arm-spe: Inject SPE samples in perf-inject
Hi Arnaldo,
On 17/11/2021 15:29, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> [...]
> Next time please expand this explanations a bit more: why should we
> inject such samples? Is this enabling some new mode of operation, fixing
> something, what is an example of output before this patch and after it?
I will keep this in mind, thanks. In this case the support was missing
and I included the context in the cover letter but not the commit msg.
Thanks,
German
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> [...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists