lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211117025956.79616-2-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date:   Tue, 16 Nov 2021 18:59:54 -0800
From:   Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To:     martin.petersen@...cle.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com
Cc:     hare@...e.de, bigeasy@...utronix.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave@...olabs.net,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] scsi/libfc: Remove get_cpu() semantics in fc_exch_em_alloc()

The get_cpu() in fc_exch_em_alloc() was introduced in:

    f018b73af6db ([SCSI] libfc, libfcoe, fcoe: use smp_processor_id() only when preempt disabled)

for no other reason than to simply use smp_processor_id()
without getting a warning, because everything is done with
the pool->lock held anyway. However, get_cpu(), by disabling
preemption, does not play well with PREEMPT_RT, particularly
when acquiring a regular (and thus sleepable) spinlock.

Therefore remove the get_cpu() and just use the unstable value
as we will have CPU locality guarantees next by taking the lock.
The window of migration, as noted by Sebastian, is small and
even if it happens the result is correct.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
---
 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
index 841000445b9a..be37bfb2814d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
@@ -825,10 +825,9 @@ static struct fc_exch *fc_exch_em_alloc(struct fc_lport *lport,
 	}
 	memset(ep, 0, sizeof(*ep));
 
-	cpu = get_cpu();
+	cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
 	pool = per_cpu_ptr(mp->pool, cpu);
 	spin_lock_bh(&pool->lock);
-	put_cpu();
 
 	/* peek cache of free slot */
 	if (pool->left != FC_XID_UNKNOWN) {
-- 
2.26.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ