[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c521bc07-0f10-e89e-a59c-b6e07fc35089@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:00:54 -0800
From: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <sudeep.holla@....com>, <cristian.marussi@....com>,
<ardb@...nel.org>, <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <trix@...hat.com>,
<lgoncalv@...hat.com>, <yilun.xu@...el.com>, <hao.wu@...el.com>,
<matthew.gerlach@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] firmware: Create firmware upload framework
On 11/17/21 7:15 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 05:13:41PM -0800, Russ Weight wrote:
>> The Firmware Upload class driver provides a common API for uploading
>> firmware files to devices.
> That is exactly what the existing firmware api in the kernel is supposed
> to be accomplishing.
>
> If it is not doing what you need it to do, then you need to document the
> heck out of why it is not, and why you need a different api for this. I
> do not see that here in this changelog at all :(
This is part of the documentation included later in this patch. I can add
this to the changelog.
+Some devices load firmware from on-board FLASH when the card initializes.
+These cards do not require the request_firmware framework to load the
+firmware when the card boots, but they to require a utility to allow
+users to update the FLASH contents.
When you say "existing firmware api", I'm thinking request_firmware, which
requires that driver names be specified in the kernel config and wants to
load firmware automatically during device initialization.
Other support under driver/firmware is specific to certain vendors, devices.
If I add this information to the changelog, is that sufficient?
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists