[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4824bf30-851e-c927-a50f-87fa2a429b2a@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 10:46:30 -0800
From: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Fix build PARAVIRT_XXL=y without XEN_PV
On 11/17/21 10:42 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 07:35:01PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 09:14:39PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>> TDX is going to use CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL
>>
>> *AARGGHHH*. srlsy? We were trying to cut back on that insanity, not
>> proliferate it.
>
> It is a way to minimize amount of changes needed for getting TDX
> functinal. We will remove the dependency later on.
>
TDX has a requirement to use HLT paravirt calls (which is currently
listed under PARAVIRT_XXL). Once we submit a patch to move it
under CONFIG_PARAVIRT, we will drop this dependency.
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists