[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202111171609.56F12BD@keescook>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 16:16:51 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Holger Hoffstätte
<holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Wang Yugui <wangyugui@...-tech.com>,
François Guerraz <kubrick@...6.net>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/923] 5.15.3-rc3 review
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 03:50:17PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Sorry for top-posting and quoting this all, but the actual people
> involved with the wchan changes don't seem to be on the participant
> list.
Adding more folks from a private report and
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215031
and for the new people, here's a lore link for this thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YZV02RCRVHIa144u@fedora64.linuxtx.org/
FWIW, earlier bisection pointed to the stable backport of
5d1ceb3969b6b2e47e2df6d17790a7c5a20fcbb4 being the primary culprit.
At first glance it seems to me that the problem with -stable is that an
unvetted subset of the wchan refactoring series landed in -stable.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists