linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: anx7625: Fix edid_read break case in sp_tx_edid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJMQK-iZ5dc0ghYZ_0F3N2QQ3cfsvOdUMg6q0WsaDTMUQvXtdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Nov 2021 03:08:27 +0800
From:   Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
        Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com>,
        Xin Ji <xji@...logixsemi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: anx7625: Fix edid_read break case in sp_tx_edid_read()

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 12:52 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 07:24:33PM +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > edid_read() was assumed to return 0 on success. After
> > 7f16d0f3b8e2("drm/bridge: anx7625: Propagate errors from sp_tx_rst_aux()"),
> > the function can return >= 0 for successful case. Fix the g_edid_break
> > condition in sp_tx_edid_read().
> >
> > Fixes: 7f16d0f3b8e2("drm/bridge: anx7625: Propagate errors from sp_tx_rst_aux()")
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c
> > index 1a871f6b6822ee..392203b576042b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/anx7625.c
> > @@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static int sp_tx_edid_read(struct anx7625_data *ctx,
> >                               g_edid_break = edid_read(ctx, offset,
> >                                                        pblock_buf);
> >
> > -                             if (g_edid_break)
> > +                             if (g_edid_break < 0)
> >                                       break;
>
> g_edid_break is declared u8 and thus never < 0. The break; statement
> doesn't indicate an error but that a break was encountered, and the
> value of g_edid_break == 1 is used elsewhere in the function to indicate
> that condition.  It also doesn't break out of the outer loop, but only
> out of the switch statement.
>
> With this patch in place, g_edid_break will have a more or less random
> value after an error, and the behavior of this function will be undefined.
>

Before 7f16d0f3b8e2("drm/bridge: anx7625: Propagate errors from
sp_tx_rst_aux()"), edid_read() only returns 0 (i2c read bytes > 0) or
-EIO, so g_edid_break also couldn't be 1. After checking the code
more, I guess what it wants to do is:

- For the 1st and 2nd block (case 0 and 1) in sp_tx_edid_read(), copy
the buffer on success.
- For other blocks (case 2 and 3), process the buffer when the last
g_edid_break updated in previous blocks is not 1. These blocks
probably don't need to be updated if previous blocks have failed. The
whole edid will be checked if valid.

I will update the patch.

> Guenter