[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0193837-2f2c-b55f-cd79-b80d931e7931@bytedance.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:26:30 +0800
From: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@...edance.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v1] sched/numa: add
per-process numa_balancing
On 11/17/21 6:10 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 05:38:28PM +0800, Gang Li wrote:
>> If those APIs are ok with you, I will send v2 soon.
>>
>> 1. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_THP_DISABLE);
>
> It would be (PR_SET_NUMAB_DISABLE, 1)
>
>> 2. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_THP_ENABLE);
>
> An enable prctl will have the same problems as
> prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMA_BALANCING, 0/1) -- it should have
> meaning if the numa_balancing sysctl is disabled.
>
>> 3. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_GET_THP);
>>
>
> PR_GET_NUMAB_DISABLE
>
How about this:
1. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMAB_DEFAULT); //follow global
2. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMAB_DISABLE); //disable
3. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMAB_ENABLE); //enable
4. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_GET_NUMAB);
PR_SET_NUMAB_DISABLE/ENABLE can always have meaning whether the
numa_balancing sysctl is disabled or not,
--
Thanks,
Gang Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists