[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211118034033.163550-1-deng.changcheng@zte.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 03:40:33 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: tj@...nel.org
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zealci@....com.cn, cgel.zte@...il.com, deng.changcheng@....com.cn
Subject: [PATCH v2] block: Use div64_ul instead of do_div
From: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@....com.cn>
do_div() does a 64-by-32 division. Here the divisor is an unsigned long
which on some platforms is 64 bit wide. So use div64_ul instead of do_div
to avoid a possible truncation.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@....com.cn>
---
block/blk-throttle.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
index 39bb6e68a9a2..2db635d66617 100644
--- a/block/blk-throttle.c
+++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
@@ -1903,7 +1903,7 @@ static void throtl_downgrade_check(struct throtl_grp *tg)
if (tg->bps[READ][LIMIT_LOW]) {
bps = tg->last_bytes_disp[READ] * HZ;
- do_div(bps, elapsed_time);
+ bps = div64_ul(bps, elapsed_time);
if (bps >= tg->bps[READ][LIMIT_LOW])
tg->last_low_overflow_time[READ] = now;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists