[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211118002501.GA74802@df6979b0ca98>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:25:01 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH morse] x86/resctrl: domain_list_lock can be static
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c:34:1: warning: symbol 'domain_list_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
Fixes: 63dc771f7240 ("x86/resctrl: Split arch and fs resctrl locks")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
---
core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
index ae5d9e2d20b3b2..439078c4a676b3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
* The rdt_resource's domain list is updated when this happens. The domain
* list is protected by cpuhp as a rwlock, writers also take this mutex.
*/
-DEFINE_MUTEX(domain_list_lock);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(domain_list_lock);
/*
* The cached resctrl_pqr_state is strictly per CPU and can never be
Powered by blists - more mailing lists