linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/self_refresh: Disable self-refresh on input events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKMK7uHS0vhZDk4d4MyBr1fJGitosmPXB21pJq6992nRCBnkoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:39:34 +0100
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        "Kristian H . Kristensen" <hoegsberg@...gle.com>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/self_refresh: Disable self-refresh on input events

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 8:37 PM Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 11:12 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> > Can you pls resend with dri-devel on cc? scripts/get_maintainers.pl
> > should pick this up, you have all the maintainers but not the list.
>
> Oops, I don't know how that happened. I guess I sometimes have to trim
> get_maintainer output, since it likes to hoover up a bunch of
> barely-relevant previous committers. I must have been too aggressive.
>
> I'll plan on sending v2 to dri-devel, but let me know (privately if
> you'd like) if you'd prefer a pure RESEND of v1.

Nah just for next version is fine, assuming you include all the
context in in-patch changelog and all that so new readers can catch
up.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch