lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211118065315.GP26989@kadam>
Date:   Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:53:15 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Anton Bambura <jenneron@...tonmail.com>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] media: staging: tegra-vde: Support reference
 picture marking

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 10:21:00PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-11-18 at 09:14 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > It's not hard to run Smatch yourself...
> > 
> > Depending on if you're on a apt distro or yum distro then fetch the
> > dependencies with one of the follow commands:
> > apt-get install gcc make sqlite3 libsqlite3-dev libdbd-sqlite3-perl libssl-dev libtry-tiny-perl
> > yum install gcc make sqlite3 sqlite-devel sqlite perl-DBD-SQLite openssl-devel perl-Try-Tiny
> > 
> > git clone https://github.com/error27/smatch
> > cd smatch
> > make
> > cd ~/kernel_source/
> > ~/smatch/smatch_scripts/kchecker drivers/subsystem/
> 
> Might want to stick something in Documentation about that.
> 

That's a good idea.  I was trying to figure out where it should go and
I looked at Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst and point 4 had
me a bit puzzled:

4) ppc64 is a good architecture for cross-compilation checking because it
   tends to use ``unsigned long`` for 64-bit quantities.

It took me a while to realize that this must have been written when 64
bit systems were new and rare.  :P  This documentation is old old old...

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ