linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/scheduler: fix drm_sched_job_add_implicit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:59:25 +0100
From:   Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>
Cc:     Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/scheduler: fix
 drm_sched_job_add_implicit_dependencies harder

Am 18.11.21 um 04:09 schrieb Rob Clark:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 5:23 PM Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/17/21 1:27 AM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 16.11.21 um 19:30 schrieb Amit Pundir:
>>>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 21:21, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> drm_sched_job_add_dependency() could drop the last ref, so we need
>>>>> to do
>>>>> the dma_fence_get() first.
>>>>>
>>>> It fixed the splats I saw on RB5 (sm8250 | A650). Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>
>>> I've added my rb, pushed this with the original fix to drm-misc-fixes
>>> and cleaned up the obvious fallout between drm-misc-fixes and
>>> drm-misc-next in drm-tip.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the help and sorry for the noise,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>> I've run into this splat on the Lenovo Yoga C630 on 5.16-rc1 - are these
>> 2 patches (which fix it) going to be heading to 5.16 or were they
>> targeted at 5.17?
> these should be for v5.16

Yeah, they are already queued up for -rc2.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> BR,
> -R