[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d04e306-064e-b9eb-8846-2d12458988a9@bytedance.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 17:49:56 +0800
From: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@...edance.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v1] sched/numa: add
per-process numa_balancing
On 11/18/21 4:58 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:26:30AM +0800, Gang Li wrote:
>> 3. prctl(PR_NUMA_BALANCING, PR_SET_NUMAB_ENABLE); //enable
>
> If PR_SET_NUMAB_ENABLE enables numa balancing for a task when
> kernel.numa_balancing == 0 instead of returning an error then sure.
Of course.
I'll send patch v2 soon.
--
Thanks,
Gang Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists