[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZWtfGNPAGtHOXZ+@builder.lan>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 19:33:48 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, agross@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robdclark@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, sean@...rly.run, vkoul@...nel.org,
quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com, aravindh@...eaurora.org,
quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com, quic_mkrishn@...cinc.com,
quic_kalyant@...cinc.coml, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add Display Port node
On Tue 16 Nov 10:43 CST 2021, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>
> On 11/15/2021 3:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2021-11-02 16:44:33)
> > > From: Kuogee Hsieh<khsieh@...eaurora.org>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh<quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
> > > ---
> > What tree is this based on? I don't see edp_phy upstream for sc7280
>
> this patch is depend onĀ --> [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: add
> edp display dt nodes
>
But there's a v3 of 3 patches in the patchworks queue, unfortunately I
don't have this in my inbox. Not sure why, but looking at
lore.kernel.org, you didn't use get_maintainers...
Also why are the patches Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>?
Did lkp tell you that you where missing edp support? ;)
Could you please resubmit the 4 patches together?
Regards,
Bjorn
> it had completed reviewed.
>
> https://mail.codeaurora.org/?_task=mail&_caps=pdf%3D1%2Cflash%3D0%2Ctiff%3D0%2Cwebp%3D1&_uid=1789&_mbox=INBOX&_action=show
>
>
> >
> > Otherwise, looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd<swboyd@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists