linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] drivers/perf: hisi: Add driver for HiSilicon PCIe PMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <acb5a232-dd09-9292-5b24-25e8e29e98e7@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Nov 2021 21:10:53 +0800
From:   "liuqi (BA)" <liuqi115@...wei.com>
To:     Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>
CC:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linuxarm@...wei.com>, <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/2] drivers/perf: hisi: Add driver for HiSilicon PCIe
 PMU



On 2021/11/18 6:41, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote:
> Hi Qi,
> 
> Thank you for working on this!  Looks really good!
> 
> Below a few tiny nitpicks that you are more than welcome to ignore, of
> course, as these would have little weight on the final product, so to
> speak.
> 
>> +struct hisi_pcie_pmu {
>> +     struct perf_event *hw_events[HISI_PCIE_MAX_COUNTERS];
>> +     struct hlist_node node;
>> +     struct pci_dev *pdev;
>> +     struct pmu pmu;
>> +     void __iomem *base;
>> +     int irq;
>> +     u32 identifier;
>> +     /* Minimum and maximum bdf of root ports monitored by PMU */
>> +     u16 bdf_min;
>> +     u16 bdf_max;
>> +     int on_cpu;
>> +};
> 
> Would the above "bdf" be the PCI addressing schema?  If so, then we could
> capitalise the acronym to keep it consistent with how it's often referred
> to in the PCI world.
> 
Hi Krzysztof,

got it, will change it to Bdf to keep the consistent, thanks.

> [...]
>> +static int __init hisi_pcie_module_init(void)
>> +{
>> +     int ret;
>> +
>> +     ret = cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_HISI_PCIE_PMU_ONLINE,
>> +                                   "AP_PERF_ARM_HISI_PCIE_PMU_ONLINE",
>> +                                   hisi_pcie_pmu_online_cpu,
>> +                                   hisi_pcie_pmu_offline_cpu);
>> +     if (ret) {
>> +             pr_err("Failed to setup PCIe PMU hotplug, ret = %d.\n", ret);
>> +             return ret;
>> +     }
> 
> The above error message could be made to be a little more aligned in terms
> of format with the other messages, thus it would be as follows:
> 
>    pr_err("Failed to setup PCIe PMU hotplug: %d.\n", ret);
>
> Interestingly, there would be then no need to add the final dot (period) at
> the end here, and that would be true everywhere else.
> 

thanks for your reminder , I'll fix that printout message to keep align.

Thanks,
Qi


> Again, thank you so much for working on this, it's very much appreciated!
> 
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>
> 
>          Krzysztof
> .
>