[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YZZXTokMn6+p7C3H@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 13:38:22 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Lh Kuo 郭力豪 <lh.Kuo@...plus.com>
Cc: "LH.Kuo" <lhjeff911@...il.com>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dvorkin@...bo.com" <dvorkin@...bo.com>,
"qinjian@...lus1.com" <qinjian@...lus1.com>,
Wells Lu 呂芳騰 <wells.lu@...plus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] SPI: Add SPI driver for Sunplus SP7021
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 09:11:08AM +0000, Lh Kuo 郭力豪 wrote:
> The main function are as follows
>
> The sp7021_spi_mas_transfer_one is replace the transfer_one_message function.
>
> static int sp7021_spi_mas_transfer_one(struct spi_controller *ctlr,
> struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_transfer *xfer)
> {
> struct sp7021_spi_ctlr *pspim = spi_master_get_devdata(ctlr);
> u32 reg_temp = 0;
> unsigned long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(1000);
I'm still not clear why this needs to be transfer_one_message() and not
just transfer_one()? The whole thing with copying everything into a
buffer is a bit confusing to me.
> The probe function is as follows.
>
> static int sp7021_spi_controller_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int ret;
> int mode;
> struct spi_controller *ctlr;
> struct sp7021_spi_ctlr *pspim;
This looks fine.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists