| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 19:20:11 +0530
From: "Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp)" <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, <collinsd@...eurora.org>,
<subbaram@...eaurora.org>, Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add pm8008 regulators
support for sc7280-idp
On 10/29/2021 2:10 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Satya Priya (2021-10-28 08:14:32)
>> Add pm8008 regulators support for sc7280 idp.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in V2:
>> - As per Stephen's comments, replaced '_' with '-' for node names.
>>
>> Changes in V3:
>> - Changed the regulator node names as l1, l2 etc
>> - Changed "pm8008-regulators" to "regulators"
>> - Changed "qcom,min-dropout-voltage" to "regulator-min-dropout-voltage-microvolt"
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>> index d623d71..493575b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
>> @@ -309,6 +309,97 @@
>> };
>> };
>>
>> +&i2c1 {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + pm8008_chip: pm8008@8 {
> If this is going to be copy/pasted wherever devices that use pm8008 live
> then it's probably better to make a new file like we do for other pmics.
Sounds good, I'll do that.
> Maybe something like
>
> &pm8008_i2c {
> <All the generic stuff in here like reg properties and
> address/size cells and compatible>
> };
>
> and then have each board set the min/max voltages and min dropout
> properties. Then we can include the pm8008.dtsi file after defining
> which i2c bus it lives on.
>
> pm8008_i2c: i2c5 { };
> #include "pm8008.dtsi"
>
> ...
>
>
> &pm8008_l1 {
> regulator-min-microvolt = <...>;
> ...
> };
>
>> + compatible = "qcom,pm8008";
>> + reg = <0x8>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pm8008_active>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pm8008_ldo: pm8008@9 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pm8008";
>> + reg = <0x9>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + regulators {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pm8008-regulator";
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + vdd_l1_l2-supply = <&vreg_s8b_1p2>;
>> + vdd_l3_l4-supply = <&vreg_s1b_1p8>;
>> + vdd_l5-supply = <&vreg_bob>;
>> + vdd_l6-supply = <&vreg_bob>;
>> + vdd_l7-supply = <&vreg_bob>;
>> +
>> + pm8008_l1: l1@...0 {
>> + reg = <0x4000>;
>> + regulator-name = "pm8008_l1";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <950000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
>> + regulator-min-dropout-voltage-microvolt = <96000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pm8008_l2: l2@...0 {
>> + reg = <0x4100>;
>> + regulator-name = "pm8008_l2";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <950000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1250000>;
>> + regulator-min-dropout-voltage-microvolt = <24000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pm8008_l3: l3@...0 {
>> + reg = <0x4200>;
>> + regulator-name = "pm8008_l3";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1650000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
>> + regulator-min-dropout-voltage-microvolt = <224000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pm8008_l4: l4@...0 {
>> + reg = <0x4300>;
>> + regulator-name = "pm8008_l4";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1504000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1600000>;
>> + regulator-min-dropout-voltage-microvolt = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pm8008_l5: l5@...0 {
>> + reg = <0x4400>;
>> + regulator-name = "pm8008_l5";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <2600000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
>> + regulator-min-dropout-voltage-microvolt = <104000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pm8008_l6: l6@...0 {
>> + reg = <0x4500>;
>> + regulator-name = "pm8008_l6";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <2600000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3000000>;
>> + regulator-min-dropout-voltage-microvolt = <112000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pm8008_l7: l7@...0 {
>> + reg = <0x4600>;
>> + regulator-name = "pm8008_l7";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3000000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3544000>;
>> + regulator-min-dropout-voltage-microvolt = <96000>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> &qfprom {
>> vcc-supply = <&vreg_l1c_1p8>;
>> };
>> @@ -437,6 +528,18 @@
>> };
>> };
>>
>> +&pm8350c_gpios {
>> + pm8008-reset {
> Why is it a subnode of a subnode? Shouldn't it be pm8008-active
> directly underneath pm8350c_gpios?
Right, I'll remove the subnode pm8008-reset.
>> + pm8008_active: pm8008-active {
>> + pins = "gpio4";
>> + function = "normal";
>> + bias-disable;
>> + output-high;
>> + power-source = <0>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> &qspi_cs0 {
>> bias-disable;
>> };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists