[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb2fa26e-58e7-945e-4f3d-613ef3cb63ae@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:31:38 -0800
From: Scott Bruce <smbruce@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/920] 5.15.3-rc4 review
On 11/18/21 00:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.3 release.
> There are 920 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 20 Nov 2021 08:14:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.3-rc4.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Built and tested for x86_64 on my Cezanne laptop (ASUS GA503QR.)
Everything seems good, there are no obvious regressions over 5.15.2.
Tested-By: Scott Bruce <smbruce@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists