[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202111180912.356B342@keescook>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:17:04 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Holger Hoffstätte
<holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Wang Yugui <wangyugui@...-tech.com>,
François Guerraz <kubrick@...6.net>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/923] 5.15.3-rc3 review
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 09:12:59AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 04:16:51PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 03:50:17PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Sorry for top-posting and quoting this all, but the actual people
> > > involved with the wchan changes don't seem to be on the participant
> > > list.
> >
> > Adding more folks from a private report and
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215031
> >
> > and for the new people, here's a lore link for this thread:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YZV02RCRVHIa144u@fedora64.linuxtx.org/
> >
> >
> > FWIW, earlier bisection pointed to the stable backport of
> > 5d1ceb3969b6b2e47e2df6d17790a7c5a20fcbb4 being the primary culprit.
> > At first glance it seems to me that the problem with -stable is that an
> > unvetted subset of the wchan refactoring series landed in -stable.
>
> What would be the vetted subset? :)
The ones with "Cc: stable" ;)
> Anyway, I have now dropped the following patches that were in the
> 5.15.3-rc tree:
> bc9bbb81730e ("x86: Fix get_wchan() to support the ORC unwinder")
> 42a20f86dc19 ("sched: Add wrapper for get_wchan() to keep task blocked")
> 5d1ceb3969b6 ("x86: Fix __get_wchan() for !STACKTRACE")
>
> And will push out another -rc release to let people test.
>
> If there are any other commits I should have also dropped, please let me
> know.
That looks right to me. These three were part of Peter's much larger
wchan refactoring (of which 42a20f86dc19 was a core part).
Thanks!
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists